WebBrown v Burdett [1882] 21 Ch D 667: Woman who instructed her trustees to seal up all but four rooms of her house. Courts said no cannot do that, it would be a waste of a property. M’Craig v University of Glasgow (1907) 44 SLR 198: Wanted his entire income used to build statues of him and his family. Courts held it should be unlawful to use ... WebBrown v Burdett [1882] 21 Ch D 667 159 Brunsden v Woolredge (1765) Amb. 507, 27 ER 327 4 Claflin v Claflin (1889) 149 Mass. 19, 20 N.E. 454 28 , 44–47 , 169–173
Table of Cases The Economic Structure of Trusts: Towards a …
WebFor example, in Brown v Burdett (1882) 21 Ch D 667 a trust had the purpose of blocking up a house’s doors and windows for 20 years. A private purpose trust will also fail if its … WebBrown v Burdett (1882) 21 Ch D 667. Facts A testator bequeathed some money to trustees. The bequest was subject to a trust to board up the property for 20 years, after … mears benefits
PPT - EQUITY AND TRUSTS PowerPoint Presentation, free …
WebBrown v Burdett 21 Ch D 667 is an English trusts law case, concerning the ability to create a trust for a purpose that does not benefit any actual person. For faster navigation, this … WebArgued March 23, 1976 Decided July 1, 1976. Together with No. 75-109, Hunerwadel v. Baird et al., also on appeal from the same court. A 1974 Massachusetts statute governs … WebThe principle from Brown v Burdett (1882) 21 Ch D 667 for a trust of imperfect obligation to be held valid they must not be perceived to be ‘useless, wasteful or capricious.’ Left money to rooms of house and held it was wasteful and capricious. ... Neville Estates v Madden [1962] Ch 832 The theory in this case is generally accepted as the ... peel and stick tiles at game